What are Voidable Transactions in Bankruptcy?

NEWS & ARTICLES

What are Voidable Transactions in BankruptcyVoidable transactions in bankruptcy are transactions made before the bankruptcy which can be recovered by the bankruptcy trustee.

If the bankrupt transferred assets, which the bankruptcy trustee judges to be property that would have formed part of the estate available to creditors, then these transactions can be voided, or reversed / undone by bankruptcy lawyers.

This is sometimes known in liquidation and bankruptcy as “claw-back provisions” or “voidable transactions”.

The Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (“Bankruptcy Act”) allows the bankruptcy trustee to void these transactions, or claw back the asset, meaning that the other party will have to transfer the asset back to the bankrupt’s estate, or pay money back to the bankrupt’s estate.

Contact our bankruptcy lawyers for advice and assistance with voidable transactions in bankruptcy

DEDICATED FOCUS – EXPERIENCED LAWYERS – PROVEN RESULTS

GET A FREE FEE ESTIMATE TODAY

What are Voidable Transactions in bankruptcy?

In the Bankruptcy Act, there are four (4) transactions which can be voided by the bankruptcy trustee, these are:

  1. Undervalued transactionssection 120 of the Bankruptcy Act; and/or
  2. Transfers to defeat creditorssection 121 of the Bankruptcy Act; and/or
  3. Transactions where consideration given to a third partysection 121A of the Bankruptcy Act; and/or
  4. Transactions giving preference to one creditor over other creditorssection 122 of the Bankruptcy Act.

The trustee is able to void the transactions above if he/she is able to do the following:

  1. Identify the transaction and identify the transaction as a voidable transaction in bankruptcy;
  2. Identify the other party to the transaction in order to get the property or money from them;
  3. Identify when the transaction occurred to prove it falls within the legislative time limits; and
  4. Ensure that the transaction was not protected property under the Bankruptcy Act.

Undervalue Transactions

Voidable Transactions Undervalued transactions

Section 120 of the Bankruptcy Act says:

(1)  A transfer of property by a person who later becomes a bankrupt (the transferor) to another person (the transferee) is void against the trustee in the transferor’s bankruptcy if:

(a)  the transfer took place in the period beginning 5 years before the commencement of the bankruptcy and ending on the date of the bankruptcy; and

(b)  the transferee gave no consideration for the transfer or gave consideration of less value than the market value of the property.

Classically, this voidable transaction in bankruptcy would be the bankrupt’s share of the family home, transferred to their partner, for no consideration, or consideration less than the market value of the property at the time of the transfer.

The full court of the Federal Court of Australia in Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Lopatinsky [2003] FCAFC 109 said that:

… it would be inconsistent with the observations of Wilcox J and Branson J in Mateo to proceed upon the basis that “consideration” could be something less than the ordinary legal and commercial understanding of that term. Indeed, it would be inconsistent with the statutory purpose of the section which is designed to protect creditors to hold that the Parliament intended to enable a transferee to provide something less than the well-established legal definition of “consideration“.

So, consideration under this section must adhere to the legal definition of consideration, and cannot be past consideration – Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Mateo [2003] FCAFC 26.

In Sutherland v Brien [1999] NSWSC 155 the Court said:

It seems to me obvious that … the Court’s task is twofold: first, to identify as precisely as one can, the consideration (if any) which was in fact given … and secondly, if consideration was given, to determine whether the value of the consideration at the time of the transfers was less than the market value of the property transferred.

So, in determining if a transaction was an undervalue transaction pursuant to section 120 of the Bankruptcy Act, and therefore a voidable transaction in bankruptcy, firstly there needs to be a determination as to whether legal consideration was given; and if so, whether the value of that consideration was equal to the market value of the property transferred.

Transfers to Defeat Creditors

Voidable Transactions Transfers to defeat creditors

Section 121 of the Bankruptcy Act says:

(1)  A transfer of property by a person who later becomes a bankrupt (the transferor) to another person (the transferee) is void against the trustee in the transferor’s bankruptcy if:

(a)  the property would probably have become part of the transferor’s estate or would probably have been available to creditors if the property had not been transferred; and

(b)  the transferor’s main purpose in making the transfer was:

(i)  to prevent the transferred property from becoming divisible among the transferor’s creditors; or

(ii)  to hinder or delay the process of making property available for division among the transferor’s creditors.

The main point to consider in relation to section 121 of the Bankruptcy Act is the intention of the debtor.  This section states that a transaction can be void if the main purpose of the transfer was to attempt to defeat creditors.

The main purpose is determined by reasonable inference from all the circumstances surrounding the transfer, at the time of the transfer.

Section 121(2) of the Bankruptcy Act says:

The transferor’s main purpose in making the transfer is taken to be the purpose described in paragraph (1)(b) if it can reasonably be inferred from all the circumstances that, at the time of the transfer, the transferor was, or was about to become, insolvent.

So, if the bankrupt was just about to become insolvent, then the transfer of property is taken to be caught by section 121.  The trustee in bankruptcy can raise the legal presumption of insolvency if they can establish that the transferor:

  1. Had not, in respect of that time, kept such books, accounts and records as are usual and proper in relation to the business carried on by the transferor and as sufficiently disclose the transferor’s business transactions and financial position; or
  2. Having kept such books, accounts and records, has not preserved them.

However, some transactions are not able to be voided by the bankruptcy trustee, these are outlined at section 121(4) of the Bankruptcy Act and are “good faith” provisions, including:

  1. The consideration is as valuable as the market value of the property; and
  2. The transferee did not know, and could not reasonably have inferred, that the transferor’s main purpose was trying to defeat creditors; and
  3. The transferee could not reasonably have inferred that, at the time of the transfer, the transferor was, or was about to become, insolvent.

Examples of transfer of property are:

  1. The transfer of monies held in the bankrupts bank account to a spouse or family member; and/or
  2. The transfer of the bankrupt’s interest in real property to a spouse, friend or family member; and/or
  3. The transfer of other property such as shares, motor vehicles etc.

Transactions where Consideration Given to a Third Party

Voidable Transactions Transactions where consideration given to a third party

Section 121A of the Bankruptcy Act says:

This section applies if:

(a)  a person who later becomes a bankrupt (the transferor) transfers property to another person (the transferee); and

(b)  the transferee gives some or all of the consideration for the transfer to a person (a third party) other than the transferor.

An example of this might be a husband and wife, where the wife is insolvent and likely to become bankrupt, transfers her interest in the matrimonial home for market value consideration to the husband; and the husband then pays that market value consideration to the wife’s sister instead of to the wife.

Section 121A allows the same right of recovery as against the third party as against the bankrupt, if they trigger sections 120 and 121 of the Bankruptcy Act.

Voidable Transactions in Bankruptcy

Avoidance of preferences in bankruptcy

Section 122 of the Bankruptcy Act says:

(1)  A transfer of property by a person who is insolvent (the debtor) in favour of a creditor is void against the trustee in the debtor’s bankruptcy if the transfer:

(a)  had the effect of giving the creditor a preference, priority or advantage over other creditors; and

(b)  was made in the period that relates to the debtor, as indicated in the following table.

Avoidance of preferences table Bankruptcy Act

A preference payment is the payment of monies from a debtor to a creditor in preference to other creditors of the debtor.

An example might be where the debtor makes the payment of a debt to a business owned by a family member, in an attempt to favour that family member over his/her other unsecured creditors.

In James v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2015] FCA 582 the Court said:

Although there appears to be a dearth of authority on the point, section 122(1) is directed at a situation of the pool of assets being available to creditors generally, being detrimentally affected by a transaction in favour of one creditor. Accordingly, in my view, what one has to do is to consider the situation of the creditors generally before the transaction, and then look at the situation afterwards and see whether the other creditors, that is the general creditors, have been disadvantaged.

The main point to consider is that the transaction must have a detrimental effect on the other creditors, in favour of one creditor.

In Sheahan v Carrier Air Conditioning Pty Ltd [1997] HCA 37 the High Court of Australia said:

To my mind, cases such as Richardson v The Commercial Banking Company of Sydney Ltd do focus consideration on the ultimate effect of the transaction with respect to the general creditors over and against the relevant creditor. Accordingly, in my view, if one can see that the position of the general creditors after the transaction was no worse than it was before the transaction then the transaction does not have the effect of giving a preference to one creditor over the others.

The above voidable transactions in bankruptcy give a brief understanding of how a bankruptcy trustee can attempt to void a transaction.

However, there are defences to those claims that the transaction contravened the Bankruptcy Act, and is therefore voidable.

Defences to Voidable Transactions in Bankruptcy

The defences to claims that transfers of property can be void, and voidable transactions are contained in the provisions themselves.

Defences to Undervalued Transactions

As mentioned, a trustee in bankruptcy would need to prove that there was no legal consideration paid, or if it was paid that it was not equal to market value.

Therefore, a market value appraisal by a legitimate valuer prior to the transfer, followed by the transfer of consideration, equal to the market value, may be a complete defence to a claim pursuant to section 120 of the Bankruptcy Act.

Or, if the transfer happened outside of the legislative timeframes allowable, either four (4), five (5), or six (6) years, depending on the circumstances of the bankrupt.

Defences to Transfers to Defeat Creditors

The main defence to a claim that a transfer of property was in an attempt to defeat creditors is by establishing that the intention of the transfer to defeat creditors was not the main purpose of the transfer.

Further, if it can be shown that the transferee acted in good faith and transferred market value legal consideration at the time of purchase, then any increase in the value of the property is protected.

Defences to Transactions Giving Preference to one Creditor over other Creditors

As previously mentioned, giving evidence that the transaction pursuant to the claim does not affect the remaining creditors, may be a defence to the claim for unfair preferences.

What Property Vests in the Bankruptcy Trustee?

Almost all of the bankrupt’s’ property will vest in the trustee, and is able to be realised to satisfy the creditors.  This includes:

  1. Property of bankrupt as at the date of commencement;
  2. All after acquired property;
  3. Relation back assets;
  4. After acquired income; and
  5. Proceeds from Court action;

Further, all of the assets from successful voidable transactions in bankruptcy claims can be realised to satisfy creditors, including:

  1. Undervalued transactions;
  2. Transactions to defeat creditors;
  3. Transactions with consideration to third parties; and
  4. Unfair Preferences.

Contact our bankruptcy lawyers for advice and assistance with voidable transactions in bankruptcy

DEDICATED FOCUS – EXPERIENCED LAWYERS – PROVEN RESULTS

GET A FREE FEE ESTIMATE TODAY

Disclaimer: The content on this website is intended only to provide a general summary of information of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive nor does it constitute legal advice. We attempt to ensure that the content is current but we do not guarantee its accuracy. You should seek legal or other professional advice before acting or relying on any of the content of this website. Your use of this website or the receipt of any information on this website is not intended to create nor does it create a solicitor-client relationship.

NEWS & ARTICLES

Discuss Your Case Today

Recent News & Articles

Claim A No Obligation Case Evaluation

Discuss Your Case With A Trusted Lawyer

We approach your dispute with – strategic thinking, commercial solutions & positive outcomes.  Our honest process is designed to get you the best commercially sensible resolution.